Corsair iCUE H150i ELITE CAPELLIX XT vs NZXT Kraken 360 (2023)computed

Both coolers at the same heat load: what each dissipates, the coolant temperature over fan speed, and the fan speed and noise each needs for the same temperature. Calculated from radiator size, core thickness and the stock fans' datasheets, not measured.

Side by side

Corsair iCUE H150i ELITE CAPELLIX XTNZXT Kraken 360 (2023)
Radiator360 mm360 mm
Core thickness27 mm30 mm
Stock fans3 × AF RGB ELITE3 × F120P (Kraken 2023 stock)
Fan rpm, datasheet500 – 1700500 – 2200
Pumpnot published2800 rpm max
Tubing450 mm400 mm
Dissipation at max rpm31.5 W/K30.1 W/K
Coolant, 250 W, 30 °C intake37.9 °C38.3 °C
Noise at max rpm, all fans38.6 dB(A)34.8 dB(A)

Coolant above intake at 250 W

0 5 10 15 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 % of max fan rpm Kraken 360 (2023) iCUE H150i ELITE CAPELLIX XT K coolant above intake, 250 W

Noise, all stock fans

below room noise 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 20 40 60 80 100 % of max fan rpm iCUE H150i ELITE CAPELLIX XT Kraken 360 (2023)

At the same coolant temperature, 250 W

K above intakeiCUE H150i ELITE CAPELLIX XT rpmdB(A)Kraken 360 (2023) rpmdB(A)Quieter
10.0115530.2161628.2Kraken 360 (2023) by 2.1 dB
12.579622.4111420.5Kraken 360 (2023) by 1.9 dB
15.058816.882215.3Kraken 360 (2023) by 1.5 dB
17.5500 min<15636<15both inaudible
20.0500 min<15509<15both inaudible
25.0500 min<15500 min<15both inaudible

The iCUE H150i ELITE CAPELLIX XT dissipates 31.5 W/K against 30.1 W/K at max fan rpm. Across the range both can hold, the Kraken 360 (2023) is quieter by about 1.8 dB at the same coolant temperature. That is inside the model's uncertainty; treat the two as equal. A cooler pinned at its fan's minimum rpm runs colder than the row asks; the comparison is then not at equal temperature.

Use it

How these numbers are computed

A radiator moves heat in proportion to the difference between coolant and incoming air: Q = q · (Tcoolant − Tair). q depends on the air actually passing through the core. Airflow per fan is CFMmax · derate · rpm/rpmmax with the radiator derate (0.62, or 0.72 for pressure-optimized blades) times the core-thickness factor. Per 120 mm segment at 27 mm: q = 8.5 W/K · (airflow / 45 CFM)0.6; heat transfer over fins scales with roughly the 0.6 power of velocity.

CoreAirflow factorFin area factor
27 mm1.001.00
30 mm0.971.09
38 mm0.901.15
45 mm0.841.22

Thick cores gain fin area but lose airflow; at low rpm the net is close to zero. With fans off, natural convection is taken as 1 W/K per segment. The band is ±15 % on q: fin density, coolant flow and preheated case air. Pump speed matters little above roughly 1 l/min. Noise is the stock fan's curve plus 10 · log₁₀(fan count).

Air entering the radiator is case air, usually 5 to 10 K above room. Die temperatures sit above the coolant by the block and TIM delta, typically 25 to 45 K under load. Nothing here is measured; the same model runs in RadiatorTemp.