Corsair iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX LCD AIO Liquid CPU Cooler vs Fractal Design Radius 360computed

Both coolers at the same heat load: what each dissipates, the coolant temperature over fan speed, and the fan speed and noise each needs for the same temperature. Calculated from radiator size, core thickness and the stock fans' datasheets, not measured.

Side by side

Corsair iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX LCD AIO Liquid CPU CoolerFractal Design Radius 360
Radiator360 mm360 mm
Core thickness27 mm55 mm
Stock fans1 × RX360 II3 × Dynamic 3 - 12 Reverse
Fan rpm, datasheet400 – 2100350 – 2200
Pumpnot published3740 rpm max
Tubing450 mm400 mm
Dissipation at max rpm26.0 W/K26.1 W/K
Coolant, 250 W, 30 °C intake39.6 °C39.6 °C
Noise at max rpm, all fans32.8 dB(A)40.7 dB(A)

Coolant above intake at 250 W

0 5 10 15 20 25 0 20 40 60 80 100 % of max fan rpm iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX LCD AIO Liquid CPU Cooler Radius 360 K coolant above intake, 250 W

Noise, all stock fans

below room noise 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 20 40 60 80 100 % of max fan rpm Radius 360 iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX LCD AIO Liquid CPU Cooler

At the same coolant temperature, 250 W

K above intakeiCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX LCD AIO Liquid CPU Cooler rpmdB(A)Radius 360 rpmdB(A)Quieter
10.0196331.3204739.1iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX LCD AIO Liquid CPU Cooler by 7.8 dB
12.5135323.3141131.1iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX LCD AIO Liquid CPU Cooler by 7.7 dB
15.099917.0104124.6iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX LCD AIO Liquid CPU Cooler by 7.6 dB
17.5772<1580519.5iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX LCD AIO Liquid CPU Cooler by 7.2 dB
20.0618<1564515.7iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX LCD AIO Liquid CPU Cooler by 6.6 dB
25.0426<15444<15both inaudible

The Radius 360 dissipates 26.1 W/K against 26.0 W/K at max fan rpm. Across the range both can hold, the iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX LCD AIO Liquid CPU Cooler is quieter by about 7.4 dB at the same coolant temperature. That is outside the ±3 dB cross-brand uncertainty and should be audible. A cooler pinned at its fan's minimum rpm runs colder than the row asks; the comparison is then not at equal temperature.

Use it

How these numbers are computed

A radiator moves heat in proportion to the difference between coolant and incoming air: Q = q · (Tcoolant − Tair). q depends on the air actually passing through the core. Airflow per fan is CFMmax · derate · rpm/rpmmax with the radiator derate (0.62, or 0.72 for pressure-optimized blades) times the core-thickness factor. Per 120 mm segment at 27 mm: q = 8.5 W/K · (airflow / 45 CFM)0.6; heat transfer over fins scales with roughly the 0.6 power of velocity.

CoreAirflow factorFin area factor
27 mm1.001.00
30 mm0.971.09
38 mm0.901.15
45 mm0.841.22

Thick cores gain fin area but lose airflow; at low rpm the net is close to zero. With fans off, natural convection is taken as 1 W/K per segment. The band is ±15 % on q: fin density, coolant flow and preheated case air. Pump speed matters little above roughly 1 l/min. Noise is the stock fan's curve plus 10 · log₁₀(fan count).

Air entering the radiator is case air, usually 5 to 10 K above room. Die temperatures sit above the coolant by the block and TIM delta, typically 25 to 45 K under load. Nothing here is measured; the same model runs in RadiatorTemp.