Corsair iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX LCD vs Corsair iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX RGB AIO Liquid CPU Coolercomputed

Both coolers at the same heat load: what each dissipates, the coolant temperature over fan speed, and the fan speed and noise each needs for the same temperature. Calculated from radiator size, core thickness and the stock fans' datasheets, not measured.

Side by side

Corsair iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX LCDCorsair iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX RGB AIO Liquid CPU Cooler
Radiator360 mm360 mm
Core thickness27 mm27 mm
Stock fans3 × RX360 II1 × RX360 II
Fan rpm, datasheet400 – 2100400 – 2100
Pumpnot publishednot published
Tubing450 mm450 mm
Dissipation at max rpm26.0 W/K26.0 W/K
Coolant, 250 W, 30 °C intake39.6 °C39.6 °C
Noise at max rpm, all fans37.6 dB(A)32.8 dB(A)

Coolant above intake at 250 W

0 5 10 15 20 25 0 20 40 60 80 100 % of max fan rpm iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX LCD iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX RGB AIO Liquid CPU Cooler K coolant above intake, 250 W

Noise, all stock fans

below room noise 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 20 40 60 80 100 % of max fan rpm iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX LCD iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX RGB AIO Liquid CPU Cooler

At the same coolant temperature, 250 W

K above intakeiCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX LCD rpmdB(A)iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX RGB AIO Liquid CPU Cooler rpmdB(A)Quieter
10.0196336.1196331.3iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX RGB AIO Liquid CPU Cooler by 4.8 dB
12.5135328.1135323.3iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX RGB AIO Liquid CPU Cooler by 4.8 dB
15.099921.899917.0iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX RGB AIO Liquid CPU Cooler by 4.8 dB
17.577217.0772<15iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX RGB AIO Liquid CPU Cooler by 4.8 dB
20.0618<15618<15both inaudible
25.0426<15426<15both inaudible

The iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX RGB AIO Liquid CPU Cooler dissipates 26.0 W/K against 26.0 W/K at max fan rpm. Across the range both can hold, the iCUE LINK TITAN II 360 RX RGB AIO Liquid CPU Cooler is quieter by about 4.8 dB at the same coolant temperature. That is outside the ±3 dB cross-brand uncertainty and should be audible. A cooler pinned at its fan's minimum rpm runs colder than the row asks; the comparison is then not at equal temperature.

Use it

How these numbers are computed

A radiator moves heat in proportion to the difference between coolant and incoming air: Q = q · (Tcoolant − Tair). q depends on the air actually passing through the core. Airflow per fan is CFMmax · derate · rpm/rpmmax with the radiator derate (0.62, or 0.72 for pressure-optimized blades) times the core-thickness factor. Per 120 mm segment at 27 mm: q = 8.5 W/K · (airflow / 45 CFM)0.6; heat transfer over fins scales with roughly the 0.6 power of velocity.

CoreAirflow factorFin area factor
27 mm1.001.00
30 mm0.971.09
38 mm0.901.15
45 mm0.841.22

Thick cores gain fin area but lose airflow; at low rpm the net is close to zero. With fans off, natural convection is taken as 1 W/K per segment. The band is ±15 % on q: fin density, coolant flow and preheated case air. Pump speed matters little above roughly 1 l/min. Noise is the stock fan's curve plus 10 · log₁₀(fan count).

Air entering the radiator is case air, usually 5 to 10 K above room. Die temperatures sit above the coolant by the block and TIM delta, typically 25 to 45 K under load. Nothing here is measured; the same model runs in RadiatorTemp.