Thermaltake TH360 V2 Ultra EX ARGB Sync Snow Edition vs Thermaltake TOUGHLIQUID 360 EX Pro ARGB Sync All-In-One Liquid Coolercomputed

Both coolers at the same heat load: what each dissipates, the coolant temperature over fan speed, and the fan speed and noise each needs for the same temperature. Calculated from radiator size, core thickness and the stock fans' datasheets, not measured.

Side by side

Thermaltake TH360 V2 Ultra EX ARGB Sync Snow EditionThermaltake TOUGHLIQUID 360 EX Pro ARGB Sync All-In-One Liquid Cooler
Radiator360 mm360 mm
Core thickness27 mm27 mm
Stock fans3 × CT120 EX ARGB Sync3 × TOUGHFAN EX12 Pro
Fan rpm, datasheet500 – 2000500 – 2000
Pump3300 rpm max3300 rpm max
Tubing460 mm460 mm
Dissipation at max rpm26.8 W/K27.5 W/K
Coolant, 250 W, 30 °C intake39.3 °C39.1 °C
Noise at max rpm, all fans33.3 dB(A)27.5 dB(A)

Coolant above intake at 250 W

0 5 10 15 20 25 0 20 40 60 80 100 % of max fan rpm TH360 V2 Ultra EX ARGB Sync Snow Edition TOUGHLIQUID 360 EX Pro ARGB Sync All-In-One Liquid Cooler K coolant above intake, 250 W

Noise, all stock fans

below room noise 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 20 40 60 80 100 % of max fan rpm TH360 V2 Ultra EX ARGB Sync Snow Edition TOUGHLIQUID 360 EX Pro ARGB Sync All-In-One Liquid Cooler

At the same coolant temperature, 250 W

K above intakeTH360 V2 Ultra EX ARGB Sync Snow Edition rpmdB(A)TOUGHLIQUID 360 EX Pro ARGB Sync All-In-One Liquid Cooler rpmdB(A)Quieter
10.0177930.8170824.2TOUGHLIQUID 360 EX Pro ARGB Sync All-In-One Liquid Cooler by 6.6 dB
12.5122622.9117817.0TOUGHLIQUID 360 EX Pro ARGB Sync All-In-One Liquid Cooler by 5.9 dB
15.090517.2869<15TOUGHLIQUID 360 EX Pro ARGB Sync All-In-One Liquid Cooler by 4.1 dB
17.5700<15672<15both inaudible
20.0560<15538<15both inaudible
25.0500 min<15500 min<15both inaudible

The TOUGHLIQUID 360 EX Pro ARGB Sync All-In-One Liquid Cooler dissipates 27.5 W/K against 26.8 W/K at max fan rpm. Across the range both can hold, the TOUGHLIQUID 360 EX Pro ARGB Sync All-In-One Liquid Cooler is quieter by about 5.5 dB at the same coolant temperature. That is outside the ±3 dB cross-brand uncertainty and should be audible. A cooler pinned at its fan's minimum rpm runs colder than the row asks; the comparison is then not at equal temperature.

Use it

How these numbers are computed

A radiator moves heat in proportion to the difference between coolant and incoming air: Q = q · (Tcoolant − Tair). q depends on the air actually passing through the core. Airflow per fan is CFMmax · derate · rpm/rpmmax with the radiator derate (0.62, or 0.72 for pressure-optimized blades) times the core-thickness factor. Per 120 mm segment at 27 mm: q = 8.5 W/K · (airflow / 45 CFM)0.6; heat transfer over fins scales with roughly the 0.6 power of velocity.

CoreAirflow factorFin area factor
27 mm1.001.00
30 mm0.971.09
38 mm0.901.15
45 mm0.841.22

Thick cores gain fin area but lose airflow; at low rpm the net is close to zero. With fans off, natural convection is taken as 1 W/K per segment. The band is ±15 % on q: fin density, coolant flow and preheated case air. Pump speed matters little above roughly 1 l/min. Noise is the stock fan's curve plus 10 · log₁₀(fan count).

Air entering the radiator is case air, usually 5 to 10 K above room. Die temperatures sit above the coolant by the block and TIM delta, typically 25 to 45 K under load. Nothing here is measured; the same model runs in RadiatorTemp.